Skip to content

English edition

GEO/AEO Optimization 2026: What Does AI Say?

What kind of content do AI search engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity) cite? Source selection, Schema.org, authority signals, and rethinking content strategy.

VZ research lens

This report is not written for trend consumption. It is written for decision quality: what to trust, what to prioritize, and what to execute first.

VZ Lens

Through a VZ lens, this is not content for trend consumption - it is a decision signal. What kind of content do AI search engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity) cite? Source selection, Schema.org, authority signals, and rethinking content strategy. The real leverage appears when the insight is translated into explicit operating choices.

TL;DR

AI search engines do not rank sources based on PageRank—they rely on authority, structure, and citability. Schema.org structured data, FAQ sections, TL;DR blocks, and evidence-based content significantly increase the likelihood of being cited by AI. Traditional SEO techniques (link building, keyword density) are less effective.

Executive Brief

We examined the source selection logic of AI search engines (ChatGPT, Gemini, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews) based on 52 sources. Research question: How should we select and optimize our content so that AI systems cite it?

Key Patterns

What Works:

  • Schema.org markup — structured data is the “language” of AI search engines; FAQ, HowTo, Article, Person schemas
  • TL;DR and summary blocks — AI quotes verbatim; if there’s a ready-made summary, it uses that
  • FAQ sections — Q&A format is ideal for AI search engines
  • Authority signals — author profile, institutional background, links to other authoritative sources
  • Evidence-based content — claims backed by sources; AI prioritizes this

What works less well:

  • Keyword density optimization (AI understands semantics, not keywords)
  • Traditional link building (AI doesn’t look at PageRank)
  • Clickbait headlines (AI looks at informational value, not clicks)
  • Thin content on many pages (AI values depth, not quantity)

Cross-LLM differences:

  • ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity use different source selection logic
  • Perplexity is the most transparent (explicit source attribution)
  • AI Overviews operate embedded within the Google search context
  • What works for all of them: structure, authority, evidence

Methodology

  • Sources: 52 (web: 34, academic: 11, industry reports: 7)
  • Research rounds: 5 (base + 3 in-depth + blind spot audit)
  • Patterns: 15 identified, 11 supported, 3 disputed, 1 nominated
  • Blind spot audit: examined source selection by non-English-speaking AI searchers and the citability of video content

Full research

The full field report is available upon request. Learn more about GFIS →

Strategic Synthesis

  • Translate the core idea of “GEO/AEO Optimization 2026: What Does AI Say?” into one concrete operating decision for the next 30 days.
  • Define the trust and quality signals you will monitor weekly to validate progress.
  • Run a short feedback loop: measure, refine, and re-prioritize based on real outcomes.

Apply to your context

If you want this framework translated into a concrete execution sequence for your team, we can map the first 30-day priorities together.

Book a strategy call Browse Hungarian originals